I decided to do 2002 next instead of 2007 since I think it's a more interesting year. And PLEASE comment on last year's resolution. It hurts my feelings when I get zero comments. So the nominees were:
Salma Hayek in Frida
Nicole Kidman in The Hours
Diane Lane in Unfaithful
Julianne Moore in Far From Heaven
Renee Zellweger in Chicago
So, who will my pick? Who are you rooting for?
14 comments:
Good choice!
It is an interesting year!
Yes, it is! All of the nominees (Except for Hayek) had a chance of winning and all of them have their supporters. You should do a profile!
This is such a crazy year! I know a lot of people hate Kidman but...I think she's still my favorite. Julianne Moore is not far behind though!
I really need to get goin' with my usual Oscar stuff, but I was thinking about a project between you, me, and Sage.
I'll talk to you more on YouTube about it.
Robert: I didn't hate Kidman, I thought she was very good. But I think she should have won for Moulin Rouge instead.
Twister: Really? I can't wait!
I think 2002 was the strongest actress lineup since 1996.
It was a very strong lineup, as was 1996!
Great line-up!
And since you talked about comments, Joe, I wanna thank you for always commenting on my blog! Without you and Sage, it would be very quiet there!
This year is okay for me...just a few standouts.
Fritz: Thanks! I love your blog! My blog experience wouldn't be the same without it!
Sage: I know that you thought that Lane and Moore killed their competion and one of them will probably be my pick, unless Renee does great with me.
Julianne will be your pick and she must be great, but I just still can't find that movie. So my pick is Lane right now.
Anything is possible, but that's most likely. I'll try to find a link for you since you MUST see her performance! Once you do see her, will you do a smackdown for 2002?
Thanks, Joe!
Once I see her, YES.
Post a Comment